M E M O

DATE: February 5, 2010
TO: The Voters and Customers of the Merrimack Village District
FROM: Merrimack Village District Board of Commissioners (BOC)
RE:

20102011 Operating Budet

Public Hearing

Monday, February 22, 2010 at 7:00pm

"Little Theater" at Merrimack High School

Cc: Merrimack Village District Staff

The purpose of this memo is to assist you in reviewing the Merrimack Village District 2010 - 2011 proposed operating budget. The summary budget is attached.

SUMMARY BUDGET COMPARISON
  Approved
2008-2009
Approved
2009-2010
Proposed
2010-2011
Increase (Decrease)
Operational $2,453,000 $2,527,620 $2,561,725 $34,105
Capital Budget Exp. 375,100 135,800 63,000 (72,800)
Capital Reserve 100,000 200,000 200,000 0
         
TOTAL $2,928,100 $2,863,420 $2,824,725 ($38,695)
The total OVERALL proposed budget (without money warrant articles) is recommended at $2,824,725 or a 1.1% decrease over the 2009 – 2010 approved budget. The total OPERATIONAL budget without capital projects reflects an increase of $34,105 or 1% above the 2009 – 2010 operational budget. The 2010 – 2011 budget includes $63,000* in capital budget expense and $200,000 in capital reserve. The proposed capital expenses are reasonable and responsible projections to continue to provide future improvements and a continuous supply of quality water.

The total 2010 – 2011 budget of $2,824,725, less the $263,000 capital budget expense and capital reserve, yields an operational budget of $2,561,725 versus the 2009 – 2010 budget of $2,863,420 less the $335,800 (capital budget expense and capital reserve), which gave us an operational budget of $2,527,620.

* Capital budget expenses include:

  • $47,000 for Vehicles and Equipment
  • $16,000 for Radio/Antenna replacement for the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system (Phase 2)

Further details on the capital budget expense projects can be found below.

The graphic breakdown of proposed expenditures is shown below.

The revenues to support this budget are projected to balance the proposed budget of $2,824,725. The BOC and staff have made considerable adjustments (both increases and decreases) in the proposed budget to match the proposed revenue projections.

The BOC adopted a System Development Charge (SDC) on August 19, 2008 based on our engineer’s evaluation of the MVD’s rate structure which at the time covered only administration and construction costs associated with new service installs and new mains. Underwood Engineers Inc. at the time stated, “An SDC is designed to cover the costs associated with the existing equity of the system or the increased incremental cost of offsite improvements needed to serve new development.” The SDC applies only to new services, installed after August 19, 2008 and is based on the size of the new service or if any existing service is increased and/or if water service demand is increased substantially (20% or more). We propose to create, with a warrant article, a new SDC capital reserve in line with the BOC policy at the 2010 Annual Meeting.

Rate increase(s) are inevitable in light of ever increasing expenditures in electricity, chemicals, fuel, inflationary costs of brass, copper, iron, plastic, wages and benefits. In July 2007 the BOC raised water consumption rates by 6.5% ($1.55 to $1.65 per 100 cubic feet). Non-consumption rates (meter, hydrant, sprinkler charges, etc.) were also raised at that time. There was no increase in consumption rates in 2008 or 2009. An increase in rates for 2010 to support the operating budget is anticipated to be 3% ($1.65 to $1.70).

To assist in your overview of the attached budget document a number of areas are explained in some detail. We trust this will be helpful.

GENERAL
1. Items such as Electricity, Heating Fuel, Gasoline, Diesel Fuel, and Chemicals are estimates based on past usage and estimated future costs.
2. “Inspection/Plan Reviews” (account #81901), was reduced from $7,000 in the 2008 – 2009 budget to $5,000 in the 2009 – 2010 budget. This account is offset by revenues.
Other general areas of the budget that are of interest and reflect changes are as follows:
PERSONNEL
Administrative Wages (50100)
1. We are anticipating a new full time superintendent to be in place for December 2010 and have budgeted for this position. It is intended that the part-time Business Manager/Superintendent position will be eliminated in December 2010. An Assistant Business Manager/Superintendent position was eliminated in April 2008. The position of Administrative Manager/Water Quality Support was added. This position, along with performing administrative and clerical duties will also support the treatment department in water quality, testing and operational data. Twenty (20) hours of this position are budgeted in administration and the remaining 20 hours are budgeted in the treatment area.
2. The overtime estimate is for administrative staff in Finance/HR and other administrative support. During the auditing and budget process and during the course of the year additional hours are necessary to complete normal duties in the finance area. This is the third year we have eliminated outside accounting services. All accounting is now handled in-house.
Field Staff Wages (50200)
1. The 2009-2010 budget allowed for 21 hours per week (2 positions) for back-up support for water quality and clerical support for treatment and distribution (backflow). This back-up has been reduced for the 2010-2011 budget to one position at an estimated 20 hours per week.
2. The Utility Field Technician (pt hydrant and others) for seasonal hydrant painting, maintenance and repair as well as meter repair and testing from May – September (approximately $15,600) and one (1) part-time temporary position (May – July) have been eliminated in this account. This seasonal position is now in outside services (81800) as a temporary position. Throughout the summer months the experienced Distribution senior field staff are frequently called away from their primary duties to assist in other areas. Providing the senior staff with part-time, temporary personnel would allow Distribution to continue and complete their scheduled programs.
Benefits

No new benefits are proposed for 2010-2011.

REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE
Motor Vehicle Maintenance (60500)
  This work was previously done by the Town of Merrimack DPW. As of July 1, 2007 the District contracted with outside services for servicing our fleet. This contractual service has worked out well. We saw a decrease in expenses from 2006-2007 to 2007-2008 ($19,184 to $16,714).
 
Actual Actual Actual Budget Expanded as Proposed
06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 12/09 10-11
$19,184 $16,714 $12,419 $23,200 $4,546 $17,000
  If after this year we continue to see a leveling of cost, this account may be able to be further reduced. The replacement of older vehicles will also assist in a possible future reduction in this account.
Chemicals (60600)
  We are notified of chemical cost increases each year that are effective January 1st and July 1st. There have been constant double digit increases over the last few years. Projecting chemical costs 18 months in advance is difficult at best. That fact combined with the different uses of various pump stations due to weather conditions, usage and the level of iron and manganese that we experience in several wells make projections even more difficult. This is evidenced by the following numbers:
Actual Approved Actual Actual Approved Expended as of Proposed
2006-2007 2007-0228 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 December 2009 2010-2011
$29,911 $82,000 $64,135 $58,905 $67,700 $12,480 $69,000
Property Taxes (60850)
  The District budgets for taxes on Wells 7 and 8 that are located in the town of Hollis. By law a water district is required to pay taxes on the land if the water source is in a different town. We are not taxed on the pump buildings on this land. The valuation of that land is currently set at $196,400. Depending on the Town of Hollis tax rate, each years tax bill will vary. We have budgeted $5,000 for 2010-2011.
 
Actual Actual Approved Proposed
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
$3,551 $4,115 $5,000 $5,000
Main Lines and Entrances — Enhancements (70200)
  We will continue upgrades to our existing main lines that are old, problematic and those that may need to be looped. No specific projects are planned for the 2010-2011 budget, however we have allowed for $30,000 for possible replacements in this account. We also plan to add several new hydrants to the system as needed and as may be budgeted.
Repair and Maintenance Lines and Entrances (70250)
 

This account remains relatively stable with the exception of 2 new areas added in 2009-2010.

  1. Patching and Paving at $10,000.
  2. $20,000 is added to this account for emergency repairs of any main lines or entrances.
Repair and Maintenance on Main Lines (70400)
  This account has increased by $20,000 for “Patching and Paving” in 2009-2010. This was previously budgeting in “Outside Services”. An additional $20,000 is again in this years proposed budget over and above the normal repair and maintenance items
Repair and Maintenance Pumping Stations (70550)
  No specific rehab of any well is planned for 2010-2011. However, $35,00 is proposed for an emergency will pump replacement and other emergency repairs.
Outside Services (81800)
  We plan to continue our gradual approach to the GPS/GIS implementation. We budgeted $23,000 for 08-09. This covered digitizing of valves, pipes and printed maps. Another $24,000 is in the 2009-2010 budget which covers collecting shut-off valve information, the creation of a bound and laminated map books, software purchase and installation, and preliminary training. An additional $20,000 is proposed for the 2010-2011 budget allowing for completion of field work, continuing training support and digitization of service (shut-off) valves and delivery of valve data to MVD.
Engineering (81900)
  The engineering account is $2,500 lower than the 2009-2010 budget. The breakdown is as follows:
  Approved
2008-2009
Approved
2009-2010
Staff
Recommendation
2010-2011
Phase VI — Exploration and Development of New Wells Fields. Final Hydrogeological by EGGI 0 $25,000 0
Phase VII — Exploration and Development of New Wells Fields. Groundwater permit from NHDES by EGGI 0 $7,500 0
Other Engineering $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
Water Quality $5,000 $7,000 $7,000
Wrap up work for New Well Development 0 0 $30,000
TOTAL $30,000 $64,500 $62,000
Inspection/Plan Reviews (81901)
  As of December 1, 2005 developers/owners/contractors with new plans for development are subject to the following:

(a) In-house review. This is done at the rate of $70.00/hour, with a minimum charge of $70.00 or as may be stipulated in MVD’s “Schedule of Rates”. This is done on a reimbursable basis and is offset in our revenue.

(b) If in-house review requires further review it is sent to our Engineer for recommendations and a hydraulic modeling to assure that there will be no adverse effects on our system. This cost is reimbursable to the MVD by the developer/owner/contractor. Again this projected cost and revenue are strict estimates as we do not have an extended history. The current economy has also affected this account reduction and reimbursable revenue.

CAPITAL OUTLAY
Capital Budget Expense (90000) (Page 20)
  The following are the capital budget expenses being proposed for 2010-2011 totaling $63,000. The 2009-2010 appropriation was $135,800.
  • New ¾ ton truck 2010 with equipment (replacing W-27) Distribution $27,000
  • Radio/antenna replacement (all stations) SCADA (2 year phasing) Treatment $16,000
  • New ½ ton truck 2010-2011 with equipment (replacing W-23) Treatment $20,000
Capital Reserve Account (90050) (Page 20)
 $200,000 is proposed to be budgeted for 2010-2011. If approved this amount will be placed directly in the existing Capital Reserves to plan for future capital needs as outlined in the Capital Improvement Program. The status of the Capital Reserve Account as of September 30, 2009 is as follows:
 
Land Acquisition $  993,755
Equipment & Facilities $1,282,655
   
TOTAL $2,276,410
Note: Underwood Engineers, Inc. at the December 18, 2006 Board of Commissioners meeting recommended consideration of adding capital funding to the budget to continue to address the District’s future needs. At that time they recommended up to $250,000 per year. In the pending update to the rate study that amount is recommended at $200,000 depending on what balance the BOC wants to preserve in the Capital Reserve.
DEBT SERVICES (BONDS)
  Actual Actual Actual Approved Proposed
  06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11
           
Principal $352,984 $265,000 $265,000 $265,000 $265,000
Interest 128,324 121,029 107,629 95,190 81,970
           

TOTAL

$481,308 $386,029 $372,629 $360,190 $346,970
           
DEBT SERVICES (LEASE METERS)
Principal $112,377 $118,953 $125,318

$132,650

$140,413
Interest 55,319 48,744 42,378 35,045 27,284
           

TOTAL

$167,696 $167,697 $167,696 $167,695 $167,697
           
GRAND TOTAL $649,004 $553,726 $540,325 $527,885 $514,667
REVENUE

Revenues for the year ending 2006-2007 came in at $2,825,066. The revenues for this period were up by $78,116 or 3% higher than the projected revenue of $2,746,950. The 2007-2008 revenues were up by $407,487 or 15% higher than the projected revenue of $2,720,407. This reflected a record increase in water pumpage of 926,193,700 gallons. The sources of revenue are summarized below.

  Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected
  2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
           
All Water Sales $1,529,925 $1,755,469 $1,528,806 $1,567,220 $1,539,292
Other Charges 1,199,867 1,282,322 1,321,838 1,175,200 1,210,433
Miscellaneous 40,264 48,578 37,846 91,000 60,000
Interest 55,010 41,525 11,156 30,000 15,000
           

TOTAL

$2,825,066 $3,127,894 $2,899,646 $2,863,420 $2,824,725

MVD revenues are heavily dependent on water sales. The revenue estimate for 2010-2011 at $2,824,725 consists of a water sales estimate of $1,539,292 or approximately 54% of total revenue. Sales of course are relative to weather and overall usage. Previous years revenues have fluctuated based on usage, weather, loss of commercial/industrial use and calculations based on total water pumped and not total water sold.

Underwood Engineers, Inc. conducted a “Lost Water Study” that was completed in February of 2007. The lost water or non-revenue water (NRW) is the difference between the amount of water produced or purchased versus the amount of sold or accounted for within a water distribution system. According to the American Water Works Association (AWWA) - “Across the U.S., the water industry considers a NRW of 10 to 12 percent as normal.” The 2001 state standard for NRW in the New England States was 15%. In 2005-2006 year MVD’s water production loss was 18.9%. Water loss from 2007 – 2008 actual proposed to actual was 10.6%. The District has been and will continue to determine and correct the “water loss” through ongoing remedial action. Our best estimate at this time is that our water loss has been reduced from 18.9% to between 10.6% and 13.2%.

WARRANT ARTICLES
The following Special Warrant Articles will be discussed at the Public Hearing on February 22, 2010 and will be voted on at the Annual Meeting on March 30th, 2010.

ARTICLE 3: Shall the Merrimack Village District vote to raise and appropriate a sum of up to two million eight hundred thousand dollars ($2,800,000) for the purpose of construction of approximately 9400 LF of 16” water main on Continental Boulevard, Camp Sargent, Amherst and/or Turkey Hill Roads? Such sum to be raised by the issuance of Serial Bonds or Notes not to exceed to two million eight hundred thousand dollars ($2,800,000) under, and in compliance with, the provisions of the Municipal Finance Act (NH RSA 33) and to authorize the Board of Commissioners to issue and negotiate such bonds or notes and to determine the rate of interest thereon, and to take such other actions as may be necessary to effect the issuance, negotiation, sale and delivery of such bonds or notes as shall be in the best interests of the Merrimack Village District; to additionally participate in the State Revolving Fund (SRF) RSA 486:14 established for this purpose and/or to participate in existing economic stimulus funding (i.e., ARRA), and to allow the Board of Commissioners to expend such monies as become available from the Federal and State Governments and pass any vote relating thereto and to authorize the Board of Commissioners to take any other action or to pass any other vote relative to said purpose and financing; and to raise and appropriate the sum of seventy-nine thousand three hundred dollars ($79,300) for the purpose of 2010-2011 interest on said bond or serial notes? (2/3 ballot vote required; polls must remain open for at least one hour).

Recommended by the Board of Commissioners (5-0-0)
Reviewed by the Department of Revenue Administration

Note: It is anticipated that up to $250,000 of the funds for this project will be reimbursed by private developers. However, due to timing of the project, it is necessary that the MVD authorize the entire project to assure its completion.

Project Description

  • The purpose of the project is to improve the available water supply from well sources in the south to areas of greater demand in the north of Town. Currently, hydraulic restrictions in the existing pipes cause high pressures in the area at the south end of Continental Boulevard and limit the rate of flow from the wells.
  • The project will also replace smaller, older mains on Camp Sargent Road.
  • The project includes up to 9,400 linear feet of 16” ductile iron water main on portions of Continental Boulevard, Camp Sargent Road, and Amherst Road. The project limits start near the intersection of Industrial Drive and Continental Boulevard extending north to the intersection of Amherst road and Turkey Hill Road.
  • The project also includes new water services and hydrants along Camp Sargent Road.
  • This project is needed in addition to the planned water main loop to be constructed by the developers of the Premium Outlets.

Funding

  • MVD proposes to fund the project from the bond issue, the State Revolving Fund (SRF) and/or stimulus funding, as determined to be in the best interests of MVD.
  • Private Party funding will be received for the portion of work along Continental Boulevard south of Industrial Drive if the Premium Outlets project moves ahead.

Rate Impacts

  • The estimated rate impact of the project is a 10% rate increase.
  • The impact may be reduced with private funding participation, use of SRF low interest loans, and/or contributions from reserves.

Schedule

The following schedule is anticipated (pending final permits and easements):

° Approval of project at Annual Meeting March 30, 2010
° Completion of Design Phase March 2010
° Bid Opening April/May 2010
° Construction Start June/July 2010
° Construction Period 1 year
° Substantial Completion Fall 2010
° Final Completion Summer 2011

ARTICLE 4: Shall the Merrimack Village District vote to raise and appropriate a sum not to exceed eight hundred thirty five thousand dollars ($835,000) for the purpose of rehabilitation of Well #6, including necessary improvements at Wells 7 and 8 to facilitate a blending of the supplies? (Note, if treatment is needed, cost will be higher) Such sum to be raised by the issuance of Serial Bonds or Notes not to exceed eight hundred thirty five thousand dollars ($835,000) under, and in compliance with, the provisions of the Municipal Finance Act (NH RSA 33) and to authorize the Board of Commissioners to issue and negotiate such bonds or notes and to determine the rate of interest thereon, and to take such other actions as may be necessary to effect the issuance, negotiation, sale and delivery of such bonds or notes as shall be in the best interests of the Merrimack Village District; to additionally participate in the State Revolving Fund (SRF) RSA 486:14 established for this purpose and/or to participate in existing or future economic stimulus funding (i.e., ARRA), and to allow the Board of Commissioners to expend such monies as become available from the Federal and State Governments and pass any vote relating thereto and to authorize the Board of Commissioners to take any other action or to pass any other vote relative to said purpose and financing; and to raise and appropriate the sum of twenty-three thousand seven hundred dollars ($23,700) for the purpose of 2010-2011 interest on said bond or serial notes? (2/3 ballot vote required; polls must remain open for at least one hour).

Recommended by the Board of Commissioners (5-0-0)
Reviewed by the Department of Revenue Administration

Project Background

  • MVD Well 6 is in the southern portion of Merrimack while Wells 7 and 8 are just over the border in Hollis. The wells are in relative close proximity.
  • MVD Well 6 has been off line since 1988 due to low level volatile organic chemical (VOC) contamination. Concentrations found in Well 6 never exceeded, nor even came close to the maximum contaminant levels (MCL’s) for the contaminants detected. Clean up of the source of the contamination took place in the 1990’s. In recent long-term pumping and water quality testing of Well 6, no VOC’s were detected. Levels of sodium and chloride were high, presumeably due to salt treatment of roads and parking lots, at times, exceeding the secondary (aesthetic/taste related) MCL’s. Levels of iron and manganese have been, and remain, very low in Well 6.
  • MVD Wells 7 and 8 have no VOC contamination and relatively low levels of sodium and chloride compared to Well 6. However, both wells have concentrations of iron and manganese that exceed the secondary MCL’s which sometimes lead to water quality problems and colored water complaints.

Project Description

The project consists of blending the discharge of Wells 6, 7 and 8 prior to entering the distribution system. Well 6 water will dilute the iron and manganese in Wells 7 and 8 while water from the latter two wells will dilute the sodium and chloride in Well 6 water. This project should avoid construction of two much more expensive treatment plants ($5 million plus) that would be required without blending the sources prior to reaching MVD customers.

The project includes a complete upgrade of the Well 6 pumping station to return this facility to regular service and improvements to the Well 7 and 8 pumping stations to facilitate the blending process.

This project will result in return of a valuable resource (Well 6) to service, and improved water quality over that currently provided by Wells 7 and 8.

Funding

  • MVD proposes to fund the project from the bond issue, the State Revolving Fund (SRF) and/or stimulus funding, as determined to be in the best interests of MVD.

Rate Impacts

  • The estimated rate impact of the project is a 3 to 5% rate increase.
  • The impact may be reduced by use of SRF low interest loans, and/or contributions from reserves.

Schedule

The following schedule is anticipated (pending final permits and easements):

° Approval of project at Annual Meeting March 30, 2010
° Completion of Design Phase December 2010
° Bid Opening January/February 2011
° Construction Start April/May 2011
° Construction Period 6 Months
° Substantial Completion Fall 2011
° Final Completion Winter 2011

We trust this will assit you in your review of the proposed 2010-2011 budget and the bond warrant articles. As always, if you have any questions, please let us know.

- END -